Oakwood Environmental Education Charter School
1225 North Oakwood Rd
Oshkosh WI, 54904, Winnebago County
Phone: 920-424-0315
Ranking: (107 out of 1,503, top 7%)*
Type: Regular Primary School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Prekindergarten to Grade 5
School District: Oshkosh Area School District
Title I Eligible School: No
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 25 | 28 | 25 | 29 | 28 | 26 | 23 | |||||||
Total Students: | 479 | 500 | 503 | 519 | 517 | 458 | 455 | |||||||
Prekindergarten: | 43 | 9.0% | 45 | 9.0% | 40 | 8.0% | 43 | 8.3% | 42 | 8.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.2% |
Kindergarten: | 62 | 12.9% | 67 | 13.4% | 68 | 13.5% | 67 | 12.9% | 77 | 14.9% | 61 | 13.3% | 78 | 17.1% |
Grade 1: | 73 | 15.2% | 68 | 13.6% | 67 | 13.3% | 80 | 15.4% | 61 | 11.8% | 83 | 18.1% | 83 | 18.2% |
Grade 2: | 70 | 14.6% | 71 | 14.2% | 82 | 16.3% | 63 | 12.1% | 87 | 16.8% | 80 | 17.5% | 85 | 18.7% |
Grade 3: | 72 | 15.0% | 86 | 17.2% | 65 | 12.9% | 86 | 16.6% | 85 | 16.4% | 83 | 18.1% | 40 | 8.8% |
Grade 4: | 90 | 18.8% | 70 | 14.0% | 91 | 18.1% | 89 | 17.1% | 87 | 16.8% | 78 | 17.0% | 73 | 16.0% |
Grade 5: | 69 | 14.4% | 93 | 18.6% | 90 | 17.9% | 91 | 17.5% | 78 | 15.1% | 73 | 15.9% | 95 | 20.9% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 247 | 51.6% | 259 | 51.8% | 257 | 51.1% | 263 | 50.7% | 254 | 49.1% | 220 | 48.0% | 223 | 49.0% |
Female: | 232 | 48.4% | 241 | 48.2% | 246 | 48.9% | 256 | 49.3% | 255 | 49.3% | 230 | 50.2% | 228 | 50.1% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 2 | 0.4% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.2% |
Asian: | 29 | 6.1% | 26 | 5.2% | 25 | 5.0% | 24 | 4.6% | 16 | 3.1% | 12 | 2.6% | 13 | 2.9% |
Hispanic: | 17 | 3.5% | 18 | 3.6% | 23 | 4.6% | 17 | 3.3% | 7 | 1.4% | 3 | 0.7% | 4 | 0.9% |
Black: | 1 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 0.4% | 2 | 0.4% | 4 | 0.9% |
White: | 421 | 87.9% | 446 | 89.2% | 444 | 88.3% | 469 | 90.4% | 491 | 95.0% | 441 | 96.3% | 433 | 95.2% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 9 | 1.9% | 9 | 1.8% | 10 | 2.0% | 8 | 1.5% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 56 | 11.7% | 64 | 12.8% | 42 | 8.3% | 33 | 6.4% | 20 | 3.9% | 28 | 6.1% | 16 | 3.5% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 15 | 3.1% | 8 | 1.6% | 16 | 3.2% | 10 | 1.9% | 9 | 1.7% | 7 | 1.5% | 9 | 2.0% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 19.55 | 17.99 | 19.80 | 17.68 | 18.27 | 17.30 | 20.10 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
WKCE | ||||||
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 94% | 86% | 78% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 98% | 85% | 77% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89% | 81% | 75% |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 94% | 83% | 78% |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 74% | 57% | 50% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 90% | 84% | 80% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 94% | 84% | 81% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89% | 83% | 81% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 94% | 81% | 81% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 50% | 36% | 35% |
2007 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 89% | 74% | 76% |
2009 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 81% | 74% | 78% |
2010 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 95% | 81% | 78% |
2011 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 91% | 80% | 77% |
2012 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 84% | 76% | 78% |
2013 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 88% | 74% | 77% |
2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 89% | 80% | 77% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 84% | 85% | 82% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 99% | 88% | 81% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 91% | 83% | 81% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 88% | 84% | 81% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 71% | 52% | 50% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 90% | 80% | 81% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 97% | 83% | 83% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 95% | 85% | 83% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 91% | 85% | 84% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 87% | 83% | 83% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 39% | 29% | 33% |
2007 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 93% | 78% | 77% |
2009 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 89% | 77% | 77% |
2010 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 98% | 80% | 79% |
2011 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 92% | 80% | 79% |
2012 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 91% | 80% | 79% |
2013 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 93% | 77% | 79% |
2007 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 96% | 92% | 91% |
2009 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 95% | 90% | 92% |
2010 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 100% | 95% | 93% |
2011 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 98% | 92% | 92% |
2012 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 97% | 94% | 93% |
2013 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 100% | 91% | 92% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 96% | 82% | 77% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 94% | 86% | 79% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 91% | 83% | 79% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 99% | 89% | 80% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 92% | 83% | 81% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 65% | 57% | 52% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 94% | 88% | 85% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 91% | 84% | 82% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 89% | 82% | 81% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 98% | 88% | 85% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 93% | 81% | 81% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 38% | 32% | 36% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Oakwood Environmental Education Charter School was rated 5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.